Listen to today's episode of StarDate on the web the same day it airs in high-quality streaming audio without any extra ads or announcements. Choose a $8 one-month pass, or listen every day for a year for just $30.
You are here
The language of astronomy is filled with terms that aren’t quite right. The word “planet,” for example, means “wanderer,” yet the planets don’t wander at all -- they follow well-defined paths around the Sun. And “asteroid” means “starlike,” even though an asteroid isn’t like a star -- it’s a chunk of rock and ice.
A more recent example is “brown dwarf” -- an object that’s more massive than a planet, but not massive enough to shine as a star.
The “dwarf” part of the name is correct -- brown dwarfs are smaller than true stars, and they’re even smaller than some planets.
But brown dwarfs aren’t brown. They glow because they’re hot, and there’s no way for a glowing ball of hot gas to produce brown light.
Figuring out a brown dwarf’s true color is tricky, though. In part, that’s because brown dwarfs have a wide range of surface temperatures -- from a few hundred degrees to a few thousand. But it’s also because brown dwarfs have complex atmospheres that contain a variety of compounds that aren’t found in true stars. Some may even have bands of clouds, like the planet Jupiter.
A couple of studies have taken a crack at calculating the color of brown dwarfs. One study said they should look orangey-red. Another found that a single known brown dwarf shines bright red, but many of them should trend toward purple. That would make them sound like characters from the Land of Oz: purple dwarfs.
More about these colorful objects tomorrow.
Script by Damond Benningfield, Copyright 2010
- ‹ Previous
- Next ›