HomeContact StarDate | About StarDate | Friends of McDonald | Sign up for Sky Tips 
McDonald ObservatoryMcDonald Observatory
A production of the University of Texas McDonald Observatory
StargazingResourcesRadioMagazineTeachersGift Shop

Image Gallery
Image Gallery
Super Planets 
Image Gallery
Planetary Smackdown 
Image Gallery
Dimming the Light 
More images »
Resources
Brightest stars
Extrasolar planets
Latest news about exoplanets
FAQs about Stars and Nebulae
Astronomy Gift Shop
2008 Sky Almanac
Pentax 10x50 binoculars
McDonald Observatory logo cap
Signs of Life
Astronomy may be within a decade or so of helping to answer one of the most intriguing questions in science: Does life exist elsewhere in the universe? Besides searching for life in our solar system and attempting to detect signals from other civilizations, astronomers are looking for planets that seem conducive to life and trying to detect signs of life in the light we receive from them.

The discovery of many giant planets orbiting other stars shows us that planets -- at least Jupiter-like planets -- probably are common. There is little chance of life on such planets, though. To find life, astronomers are trying to detect small, rocky planets similar to Earth. This lies beyond current abilities, although it may not be far off.

An artist's concept of a giant planet orbiting a star other than the Sun.

An artist's concept of a giant planet orbiting a star other than the Sun as seen from an icy moon. Although such 'giant Jupiters' are considered unlikely homes for life, their moons may be better candidates -- perhaps in oceans beneath their icy crusts.

Most of today's planet-finding methods detect the effects of planets on the motion or light of the stars they orbit; they cannot "see" a planet directly. To find the signatures of life, astronomers must take pictures of and analyze the light from the planets themselves. But Earth-like planets around other stars are small and faint, so direct imaging will require large space telescopes that can block the light from the parent star. One is planned: Terrestrial Planet Finder/Darwin.

No one has come up with a complete definition of "life," but astrobiologists (the scientists who study the possibility of life beyond Earth) are narrowing the search to the type of life that's most familiar to us -- "life as we know it."

This type of life requires complex carbon-based compounds that interact in liquid water. Carbon is unrivaled in its ability to form strong bonds, and in its ability to form the complex molecules that can store and transfer enormous amounts of information -- one of the hallmarks of life. Liquid water is unique in many of its properties and in the diverse functions that it can carry out efficiently. Carbon and the hydrogen and oxygen that make up water are abundant in the universe. Water and complex carbon molecules have been detected in the harsh environment of space, so we know they form easily.

Liquid water can exist only within a narrow range of temperatures. The temperature of a planet is determined mostly by its distance from its star, so there is a narrow range of distances, called the "habitable zone," where astronomers expect to find such liquid-water-bearing planets. The detection of water vapor in a planet's atmosphere would provide strong evidence that the planet's temperature is "just right" for life. Carbon dioxide also is a good indicator that a planet is suitable for life.

But these are signs that a planet is conducive to life, not that any organisms actually live there. What would be a real biosignature? Many scientists think that abundant molecular oxygen, or its product, ozone, is a strong one because on Earth molecular oxygen is produced mostly by the photosynthesis of plants. The simultaneous detection of water, carbon dioxide, and oxygen or ozone would be a strong indicator that biological processes are occurring on a planet.

Also, the detection of large amounts of oxygen and a gas like methane or nitrous oxide would be a strong signature, because on Earth these gases are produced almost entirely by biological processes. Methane is a prime target for TPF/Darwin, but it might be difficult to detect. However, researchers recently discovered that these biosignatures, as well as that of methyl chloride -- a compound that on Earth is produced almost entirely by living organisms -- could be far stronger on Earth-like planets orbiting the small, cool stars known as red dwarfs. This could make such stars prime targets for observations.

The surface of a planet also holds a wealth of information. Certain properties of light reflected from green plants could provide a good biosignature. A related approach uses the different percentages of light that is reflected by oceans, deserts, vegetation, clouds, and ice. Variations in how much light a planet reflects as it rotates could reveal large oceans, surface ice, or even forests on Earth-like planets.

None of these biosignatures is clear-cut, and any of them could be produced by processes other than life. Taken together, however, they form a suite of tests that can suggest whether Earth-like planets harbor Earth-like life.

Copyright ©1995-2006 The University of Texas McDonald Observatory. Material on this site may be linked to, quoted or reproduced for educational or personal purposes without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given. Teachers, scout leaders, and others may distribute the material for classroom instruction or related educational purposes. The materials may not be sold or published in any other form without written permission from The University of Texas McDonald Observatory.